For what it's worth, I was able to reproduce what you've already reported. Meaning I was able to run "ocpirun -v -d -t 15 fsk_modem_app" on the e310, but the output .bin file was not recognized by eog.
From: discuss-request@lists.opencpi.org discuss-request@lists.opencpi.org
Sent: 21 April 2021 03:30
To: discuss@lists.opencpi.org discuss@lists.opencpi.org
Subject: discuss Digest, Vol 34, Issue 7
Send discuss mailing list submissions to
discuss@lists.opencpi.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via email, send a message with subject or
body 'help' to
discuss-request@lists.opencpi.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
discuss-owner@lists.opencpi.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of discuss digest..."
Today's Topics:
- Re: Test Application Troubleshooting (fsk_mode_app.xml)
(anonymous254367@gmail.com)
- Re: Test Application Troubleshooting (fsk_mode_app.xml)
(anonymous254367@gmail.com)
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 08:39:24 +0000
From: anonymous254367@gmail.com
Subject: [Discuss OpenCPI] Re: Test Application Troubleshooting
(fsk_mode_app.xml)
To: discuss@lists.opencpi.org
Message-ID:
LVkaNoIsApumMbNIF4TRl92V6PSoUmn500X2uFctic@lists.opencpi.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="b1_LVkaNoIsApumMbNIF4TRl92V6PSoUmn500X2uFctic"
Closeout
Is it possible to remove obsolete documents and update supporting documentation? Information about OCPI_LIBRARY_PATH and the arguments for .target-<rss-platform> appear to be scattered over several documents. Is it possible to make the requirements for OCPI_LIBRARY_PATH clearer?
Is it worth removing obsolete information/documents? Having obsolete information can make troubleshooting confusing with so much conflicting or incorrect information.
I understand it's an open source project so my assumption would be this isn't a full time commitment from contributors. Plus documentation is always a boring task.
All documentation was sourced from https://opencpi.gitlab.io/releases/latest/ if that helps with my comments/people reading this post.
I hope someone else out there potentially finds this useful. Apologise for the large post.
For what it's worth, I was able to reproduce what you've already reported. Meaning I was able to run "ocpirun -v -d -t 15 fsk_modem_app" on the e310, but the output .bin file was not recognized by eog.
________________________________
From: discuss-request@lists.opencpi.org <discuss-request@lists.opencpi.org>
Sent: 21 April 2021 03:30
To: discuss@lists.opencpi.org <discuss@lists.opencpi.org>
Subject: discuss Digest, Vol 34, Issue 7
Send discuss mailing list submissions to
discuss@lists.opencpi.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via email, send a message with subject or
body 'help' to
discuss-request@lists.opencpi.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
discuss-owner@lists.opencpi.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of discuss digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Test Application Troubleshooting (fsk_mode_app.xml)
(anonymous254367@gmail.com)
2. Re: Test Application Troubleshooting (fsk_mode_app.xml)
(anonymous254367@gmail.com)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 08:39:24 +0000
From: anonymous254367@gmail.com
Subject: [Discuss OpenCPI] Re: Test Application Troubleshooting
(fsk_mode_app.xml)
To: discuss@lists.opencpi.org
Message-ID:
<LVkaNoIsApumMbNIF4TRl92V6PSoUmn500X2uFctic@lists.opencpi.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="b1_LVkaNoIsApumMbNIF4TRl92V6PSoUmn500X2uFctic"
##### Closeout
Is it possible to remove obsolete documents and update supporting documentation? Information about OCPI_LIBRARY_PATH and the arguments for .target-<rss-platform> appear to be scattered over several documents. Is it possible to make the requirements for OCPI_LIBRARY_PATH clearer?
Is it worth removing obsolete information/documents? Having obsolete information can make troubleshooting confusing with so much conflicting or incorrect information.
I understand it's an open source project so my assumption would be this isn't a full time commitment from contributors. Plus documentation is always a boring task.
All documentation was sourced from https://opencpi.gitlab.io/releases/latest/ if that helps with my comments/people reading this post.
I hope someone else out there potentially finds this useful. Apologise for the large post.
