Zynq UltraScale+ Support

BP
Brian Padalino
Thu, Jun 11, 2020 7:05 PM

I see there is preliminary Zynq UltraScale+ support in the v1.7.0-beta.1
tag.

I tried to do a quick little test to see if I could build for it, and it
seems like maybe it's still very beta and not necessarily working?

Will v1.7.0 have UltraScale+ support when it is released?

Thanks,
Brian

I see there is preliminary Zynq UltraScale+ support in the v1.7.0-beta.1 tag. I tried to do a quick little test to see if I could build for it, and it seems like maybe it's still very beta and not necessarily working? Will v1.7.0 have UltraScale+ support when it is released? Thanks, Brian
JK
James Kulp
Thu, Jun 11, 2020 7:08 PM

The zcu104 already builds and passes no

Sent from my phone.

On Jun 11, 2020, at 15:06, Brian Padalino bpadalino@gmail.com wrote:

I see there is preliminary Zynq UltraScale+ support in the v1.7.0-beta.1
tag.

I tried to do a quick little test to see if I could build for it, and it
seems like maybe it's still very beta and not necessarily working?

Will v1.7.0 have UltraScale+ support when it is released?

Thanks,
Brian

The zcu104 already builds and passes no Sent from my phone. > On Jun 11, 2020, at 15:06, Brian Padalino <bpadalino@gmail.com> wrote: > > I see there is preliminary Zynq UltraScale+ support in the v1.7.0-beta.1 > tag. > > I tried to do a quick little test to see if I could build for it, and it > seems like maybe it's still very beta and not necessarily working? > > Will v1.7.0 have UltraScale+ support when it is released? > > Thanks, > Brian >
JK
James Kulp
Thu, Jun 11, 2020 7:10 PM

I meant to say the zcu104 passes most tests AFAIK, it is getting more testing in this beta period.  It is supposed to be supported in 1.7

Sent from my phone.

On Jun 11, 2020, at 15:06, Brian Padalino bpadalino@gmail.com wrote:

I see there is preliminary Zynq UltraScale+ support in the v1.7.0-beta.1
tag.

I tried to do a quick little test to see if I could build for it, and it
seems like maybe it's still very beta and not necessarily working?

Will v1.7.0 have UltraScale+ support when it is released?

Thanks,
Brian

I meant to say the zcu104 passes most tests AFAIK, it is getting more testing in this beta period. It is supposed to be supported in 1.7 Sent from my phone. > On Jun 11, 2020, at 15:06, Brian Padalino <bpadalino@gmail.com> wrote: > > I see there is preliminary Zynq UltraScale+ support in the v1.7.0-beta.1 > tag. > > I tried to do a quick little test to see if I could build for it, and it > seems like maybe it's still very beta and not necessarily working? > > Will v1.7.0 have UltraScale+ support when it is released? > > Thanks, > Brian >
BP
Brian Padalino
Thu, Jun 11, 2020 7:12 PM

On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 3:11 PM James Kulp jek@parera.com wrote:

I meant to say the zcu104 passes most tests AFAIK, it is getting more
testing in this beta period.  It is supposed to be supported in 1.7

Thanks.  I noticed something weird with the 'clocking' not being built and
then stopped, so I added the zynq_ultra to the allowed configs and things
seem to get further.

Is there an expected 1.7 release date?

Thanks,
Brian

Sent from my phone.

On Jun 11, 2020, at 15:06, Brian Padalino bpadalino@gmail.com wrote:

I see there is preliminary Zynq UltraScale+ support in the v1.7.0-beta.1
tag.

I tried to do a quick little test to see if I could build for it, and it
seems like maybe it's still very beta and not necessarily working?

Will v1.7.0 have UltraScale+ support when it is released?

Thanks,
Brian

On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 3:11 PM James Kulp <jek@parera.com> wrote: > I meant to say the zcu104 passes most tests AFAIK, it is getting more > testing in this beta period. It is supposed to be supported in 1.7 > Thanks. I noticed something weird with the 'clocking' not being built and then stopped, so I added the zynq_ultra to the allowed configs and things seem to get further. Is there an expected 1.7 release date? Thanks, Brian > > Sent from my phone. > > > On Jun 11, 2020, at 15:06, Brian Padalino <bpadalino@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > I see there is preliminary Zynq UltraScale+ support in the v1.7.0-beta.1 > > tag. > > > > I tried to do a quick little test to see if I could build for it, and it > > seems like maybe it's still very beta and not necessarily working? > > > > Will v1.7.0 have UltraScale+ support when it is released? > > > > Thanks, > > Brian > >
JD
Jerry Darko
Thu, Jun 11, 2020 7:15 PM

From: discuss discuss-bounces@lists.opencpi.org on behalf of Brian Padalino bpadalino@gmail.com
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2020 3:12 PM
To: James Kulp jek@parera.com
Cc: discuss@lists.opencpi.org discuss@lists.opencpi.org
Subject: Re: [Discuss OpenCPI] Zynq UltraScale+ Support

On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 3:11 PM James Kulp jek@parera.com wrote:

I meant to say the zcu104 passes most tests AFAIK, it is getting more
testing in this beta period.  It is supposed to be supported in 1.7

Thanks.  I noticed something weird with the 'clocking' not being built and
then stopped, so I added the zynq_ultra to the allowed configs and things
seem to get further.
There's an issue and MR request to fix that problem.

Is there an expected 1.7 release date?

Thanks,
Brian

Sent from my phone.

On Jun 11, 2020, at 15:06, Brian Padalino bpadalino@gmail.com wrote:

I see there is preliminary Zynq UltraScale+ support in the v1.7.0-beta.1
tag.

I tried to do a quick little test to see if I could build for it, and it
seems like maybe it's still very beta and not necessarily working?

Will v1.7.0 have UltraScale+ support when it is released?

Thanks,
Brian
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <

________________________________ From: discuss <discuss-bounces@lists.opencpi.org> on behalf of Brian Padalino <bpadalino@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2020 3:12 PM To: James Kulp <jek@parera.com> Cc: discuss@lists.opencpi.org <discuss@lists.opencpi.org> Subject: Re: [Discuss OpenCPI] Zynq UltraScale+ Support On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 3:11 PM James Kulp <jek@parera.com> wrote: > I meant to say the zcu104 passes most tests AFAIK, it is getting more > testing in this beta period. It is supposed to be supported in 1.7 > Thanks. I noticed something weird with the 'clocking' not being built and then stopped, so I added the zynq_ultra to the allowed configs and things seem to get further. There's an issue and MR request to fix that problem. Is there an expected 1.7 release date? Thanks, Brian > > Sent from my phone. > > > On Jun 11, 2020, at 15:06, Brian Padalino <bpadalino@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > I see there is preliminary Zynq UltraScale+ support in the v1.7.0-beta.1 > > tag. > > > > I tried to do a quick little test to see if I could build for it, and it > > seems like maybe it's still very beta and not necessarily working? > > > > Will v1.7.0 have UltraScale+ support when it is released? > > > > Thanks, > > Brian > > -------------- next part -------------- > > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > > URL: < > http://lists.opencpi.org/pipermail/discuss_lists.opencpi.org/attachments/20200611/a6ed3ebd/attachment.html > > > > _______________________________________________ > > discuss mailing list > > discuss@lists.opencpi.org > > http://lists.opencpi.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.opencpi.org > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.opencpi.org/pipermail/discuss_lists.opencpi.org/attachments/20200611/f933734c/attachment.html> _______________________________________________ discuss mailing list discuss@lists.opencpi.org http://lists.opencpi.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss_lists.opencpi.org